Ecoterra Press Release 221 – The Somalia Chronicle June – December 2009, no 33

Following the Somalia Spring 2009 Chronicles, I herewith republish the Ecoterra press releases issued in the second half of 2009. I reproduce the integral version of all Ecoterra press releases in a recapitulative effort to provide the global readership with the most comprehensive collection of texts published worldwide about the most abominable Western postcolonial involvement in Africa, namely the systematic effort of extermination of the Somali Nation. The vast documentation provided serves as basic point of reference to students, researchers, analysts and intellectuals.

ECOTERRA Intl.

SMCM

Somali Marine & Coastal Monitor

ECOTERRA INTERNATIONAL - UPDATES & STATEMENTS, REVIEW & CLEARING-HOUSE

2009-08-03 MON 17h59:18 UTC

Issue No. 221

A Voice from the Truth- & Justice-Seekers, who sit between all chairs, because they are not part of organized white-collar or no-collar-crime in Somalia or elsewhere, and who neither benefit from global naval militarization, from the illegal fishing and dumping in Somali waters or the piracy of merchant vessels, nor from the booming insurance business or the exorbitant ransom-, risk-management- or security industry, while neither the protection of the sea, the development of fishing communities or the humanitarian assistance to abducted seafarers and their families is receiving the required adequate attention, care and funding.

"During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." George Orwell

EA ILLEGAL FISHING AND DUMPING HOTLINE: +254-714-747090 (confidentiality guaranteed) - email: somalia[at]ecoterra.net

EA Seafarers Assistance Programme EMERGENCY HELPLINE : SMS to +254-738-497979 or sms/call +254-733-633-733

"The pirates must not be allowed to destroy our dream !"

Cpt. Florent Lemaçon - F/Y Tanit - killed by French commandos - 10. April 2009 / Ras Hafun

NON A LA GUERRE - YES FOR PEACE

(Inscription on the sail of F/Y TANIT - shot down on day one of the French assault)

"... obligation to fight oppression and cruelty wherever it appears, and that any group of people who are degrading another group of people have to be fought against with whatever tools we have available to us. "

B. H. Obama - US-American President, who said also: The world has changed ! YES, WE CAN !

Clearing-House: Cut out the clutter - focus on facts !

(If you find this compilation too large or if you can't gasp the multitude and magnitude of important inter-related complex issues - you better do not deal with Somalia or other man-made "conflict zones". We try to make it as condensed as possibly.)

Breaking:

MV HANSA STAVANGER FREE

The nightmare of being held hostage in Somalia is over for five Germans, three Russians, two Ukrainians, two Filipinos,11 Tuvaluans and one sailor from Fiji. German owned, German-flagged MV HANSA STAVANGER has been freed. All pirates are now off board and the vessel is sailing - our sources confirmed. The vessel, which was destined for Mombasa / Kenya, however, is accordings to navy reports apparently sailing north to Jabel Ali / Dubai from the central Somalia coast, where it had been held near Harardheere for exactly four month. Reason could be that the cargo-owners will be the new hostages in this case until they pay up a 25% share of the value for a general average damage contribution, the ship-owner - LEONHARDT & BLUMBERG of Hamburg - had demanded - but none of the cargo owners had followed that request. Assuranceforeningen Gard - Norway, the ships insurer and Mr. Frank Leonhardt for the owners as well as two attempts to show naval might had made the negotiations difficult, while the captors and appointed negotiators played their games. The box-ship with around 1,070 containers was sea-jacked by Somali sea-shifta on 3rd April 2009 400 km off the southern Somali port of Kismaayu. As already widely reported a ransom of 2.7mio USD was delivered around noon today by aircraft to the ship.

News from sea-jackings, abductions, newly attacked ships and vessels in distress

Crew was suffering mentally under pirates'

The owner of a German ship held by pirates off the coast of Somalia said the crew members were suffering mentally after four months of captivity, in a newspaper interview published Sunday.

"All crew members on board are in physically good shape," Frank Leonhardt, the owner of the Hansa Stavanger freight ship, told German Bild am Sonntag newspaper. He said their psychological well-being was a different matter.

"Of course the mental strain for the sailors and their relatives is considerable," the ship owner said.

The pirates have reportedly demanded a ransom of $3-million (about R) for the ship and crew, Bild reported.

The container ship, owned by Leonhardt & Blumberg shipping company in Hamburg, was seized on April 4 around 400 nautical miles off the Somali coast, between Kenia and the Seychelles.

The captain's wife and the German union of captains and ship officers have criticised the ship owners' handling of the situation.

They say the situation is critical on board the ship, where there are water shortages and crew members have fallen ill.

These details are said to have emerged from telephone calls and emails with relatives on board the ship, taking place under the pirates' supervision.

Five of the captive crew members are German, including two 19-year-old trainees and the captain. (dpa)

With the latest captures and releases now still at least 12 foreign vessels (11 if M/S IO EXPLORER is truly "gone") with a total of not less than 168 crew members are accounted for (of which 42 are confirmed to be Filipinos) and are held in Somali waters. They are monitored on our actual case-list, while several other cases of ships, which were observed off the coast of Somalia and have been reported or had reportedly disappeared without trace or information, are still being followed. MV JAIKUR 1 remains in Mogadishu harbor, but is an insurance and not a piracy case - all foreign crew was evacuated. Over 134 incidences (including attempted attacks, averted attacks and successful sea-jackings) had been recorded for 2008 with 49 fully documented, factual sea-jacking cases (for Somalia, incl. presently held ones) and the mistaken sinking of one vessel by a naval force. For 2009 the account stands at 151 attacks (incl. averted or abandoned attacks) with 47 sea-jackings on the Somali/Yemeni pirate side as well as at least three wrongful attacks (incl. one friendly fire incident) on the side of the naval forces. More than 116 Somalis are held in foreign prisons under charges of piracy. Mystery pirate mother-vessels Athena/Arena and Burum Ocean as well as not fully documented cases of absconded vessels are not listed in the sea-jack count until clarification. Several other vessels with unclear fate (also not in the actual count), who were reported missing over the last ten years in this area, are still kept on our watch-list, though in some cases it is presumed that they sunk due to bad weather or being unfit to sail. In the last four years, 22 missing ships have been traced back with different names, flags and superstructures.

Piracy incidents usually degrade during the monsoon season in winter and rise gradually by the end of the monsoon season starting from mid February and early April every year. Present multi-factorial risk assessment code: GoA: YELLOW IO: YELLOW (Red = Very much likely, high season; Orange = Reduced risk, but very likely, Yellow = significantly reduced risk, but still likely, Blue = possible, Green = unlikely). Allegedly still/again two groups from Puntland alone are out hunting on the Gulf of Aden and in the Indian Ocean, where also groups from Harardheere have set out again, despite the heavy seas and the rough weather.

Directly piracy related reports

Pirates may be dragging out ransom negotiations by Richard Meade

The release of eleven Indonesian seafarers almost eight months after their ship was first hijacked has highlighted growing industry concern that ransom negotiation are dragging on longer than ever before.

The Malaysian-flagged tug Masindra 7 was finally released over the weekend following protracted negotiations between the vessel´s Malaysian owner Masindra Shipping and the group of pirates that captured the vessel off the Yemen coast on December 16 last year. The deal came amid unconfirmed reports today that a $2.7m ransom payment had been parachuted onto the German boxship Hansa Stavanger with the intention of ending a four month ransom negotiation for the release of the vessel and its 24 crew.

While security experts argue that each hostage situation has its own set of complications, shipping industry insiders close to current negotiations have told Lloyd´s List that several negotiations are being deliberately extended by pirates pushing for higher ransom figures.

Experts suggest that the relative lack of recent pirate activity off Somalia due to monsoon weather has led pirate gangs to ramp up the existing negotiations and push for higher ransoms. Each time the price is pushed up the delicate negotiations falter as the shipowners and negotiators on both sides seek to clarify details.

"Only people who know the inside details of these negotiations will be able to explain why these deals are taking longer, but it could be that there are problems with personalities and difficulties with people holding out on both sides," said one expert close to current hostage negotiations.

In the case of the Hansa Stavanger, negotiations are understood to have broken down several times since the 1,550 teu vessel was first hijacked on April 4 with five Germans, three Russians, two Ukrainians and 14 Filipinos on board.

Discussions have been particularly fraught after the pirates learned of an aborted attempt in May by Germany´s elite GSG9 special forces to rescue the 1997-built, Liberia-flagged vessel.

There have also been unconfirmed reports that the ransoms demands have steadily increased at each stage, starting from $2.2m, then $2.5m and reportedly closing with $2.7m today being delivered to the pirates via an air drop and a bank account in Kenya.

The vessels owner Leonhardt & Blumberg today refused to confirm or deny the reports that a ransom payment had been made.

"Things are definitely taking longer," said one private security source. "This is partly because it is not so easy for the pirates to find ships at the moment so they hold on to the ships they have for longer. It is a question of leverage."

A total of 10 vessels and approximately 167 crew are still being held hostage in various locations in Somalia.

No real peace in sight yet

Puntland president urges TFG to avoid centralism

The president of Puntland State of Somalia, Abdirahman Mohamed Farole, has urged the transitional federal government of Somalia to work on helping regions set up regional administrations as bedrock of future federal government of Somalia. The president said that his administration "is in talks with the TFG to discuss issues about the Transitional Federal Government of Somalia's work with Puntland."

"There are issues such as the misuse of the TFG's international legitimacy for political and financial purposes. This problem is compounded when a group tries to promote itself on the international community fora as the sole authority through which development and reconstruction assistance can be channelled for Somalia although such a group has neither the means nor the capability nd experience to undertake such a task . This has always been a perennial Somali problem. Puntland will never accept such a political deadlock," president Abdirahman Farole said.

The president was speaking at ceremony marking the 11th anniversary of Puntland State of Somalia held at Puntland Presidential Place in Garowe. He urged the international community to ensure that any assistance earmarked for Somalia be shared between the TFG, Somaliland and Puntland. "Puntland wants to remain part of the Transitional Federal Government of Somalia. The TFG ought to promote a bottom-up approach to nation building rather than top-down approach. It will be easier to conduct a referendum on a federal charter when all regions have their own administrations' " he said.

Analysts believe that Puntland president's remarks will not go down well with some members of the TFG who, before joining the TFG on the Alliance for the Reliberation of Somalia ticket, had campaigned against federalism for Somalia.

Impacting reports from the global village

Former Somali Officers Attend UN-Backed Meeting to Help Beef Up Security

A United Nations-backed meeting of former high-ranking officials from Somalia's military, police, prison system and intelligence services kicked off in the U.S. of America in the latest bid at bolstering the war-wracked country's security institutions.

"In keeping with the spirit of the Djibouti process, this is an opportunity for the former Somali military leaders to contribute to the rebuilding of their nation," said Ahmedou Ould-Abdallah, UN Special Representative for Somalia, referring to internationally backed reconciliation efforts that started last year in neighbouring Djibouti.

The former senior officers of the Somali security forces are expected to share its knowledge of and know-how with the current leadership during the five-day workshop, convened by the UN Political Office for Somalia (UNPOS) and led by the Somali Ministry of Defence, in Washington DC.

In-depth discussions are slated to focus on both the historical background of the Somali security forces, and the re-establishment and strengthening of the security sector, with the intention of producing a document outlining strategies to address short-term security challenges and long-term capacity building measures.

"History has a lot to teach us if we're willing to learn from past experiences - failures and successes," said Mr. Ould-Abdallah. "These former senior military officials will have an opportunity to serve their country in another capacity."

Despite the signing of peace agreements, the formation of a new Government and election of a new president, the Horn of Africa nation has seen a resurgence of violence in recent months.

Fighting between Government forces and the Al-Shabaab and Hisb-ul-Islam militant groups in Mogadishu since early May have forced over 230,000 people from their homes, many of them for the second time over the course of the past year.

Off to Africa, Clinton to pledge new Somali aid by Matthew Lee and Lolita C. Baldor (AP)

On a seven-nation tour of Africa this week, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton will pledge more U.S. assistance, including military aid, to Somalia's shaky government as it fights for survival against Islamist extremists.

U.S. officials say the Obama administration plans to go ahead with additional weapons supplies to double an initial provision of 40 tons of arms. The U.S. also has begun a low-profile mission to help train Somali security forces in neighboring Djibouti, said the officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivities surrounding U.S. involvement in the program.

Clinton will see Somalia's beleaguered interim president, Sheik Sharif Sheik Ahmed, on Thursday in Kenya, the first stop on her trip. She intends to reaffirm American backing of Ahmed's Transitional Federal Government.

Clinton's meeting with Sheik Ahmed comes at critical juncture for Somalia, which has not had a functioning government since 1991 and is home to a growing radical Islamist movement known as al-Shabab. The group, which U.S. officials say has links to al-Qaida, was designated a terrorist organization by Washington last year.

It's not clear if Clinton will make a specific contribution at the meeting. The administration's top diplomat for Africa, Johnnie Carson, said last week that "we are prepared to provide additional assistance to the (Somali) government."

Carson added that the U.S. would also continue to support a small African Union peacekeeping force manned by soldiers from Uganda and Burundi.

Carson did not elaborate on the assistance. Other officials said a second batch of up to 40 tons of new weaponry, added to 40 tons that arrived over the past several months, will come from stockpiles held by African militaries. The United States would pay for it, officials said.

One senior official said the Pentagon, which has a base at Camp Lemonier in Djibouti, is providing facilities such as tents for the training and is assisting with logistics.

Officials say the U.S. military is not conducting the training and will not put any forces in Somalia. The administration is making a concerted effort to avoid putting any American footprint in Somalia, which would risk alienating allies and add to charges by Islamic extremists of a Western takeover.

Djibouti is one of several nations mentioned as willing to help train Somalia's rudimentary police and military.

Last week, the European Union agreed in principle to send military advisers to Djibouti to train Somali forces in counterinsugency and anti-piracy tactics. In mid-July, two French security advisers in the country to train Somali security forces were abducted from and a hotel in Mogadishu, the Somali capital.

Al-Shabab has claimed responsibility and said they would be tried under Islamic law for alleged spying and "conspiracy against Islam."

Violence in Somalia has surged in recent years, catapulting the nation into the top 10 most violent countries in the world for the past two years, according to the National Counterterrorism Center. NCTC data, which covers attacks against civilians or noncombatants, shows that there were 767 terrorism-related deaths in 2007 and nearly 2,000 in 2008.

Only three countries saw more killings in 2008 — Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan.

The Somali government holds only a few blocks in Mogadishu, with support from the peacekeepers, although it still controls the port, the airport and key government buildings. The top U.N. envoy for Somalia said last week that the country is at a "turning point" and in desperate need of international support, especially military equipment, training and money.

At the same time, the Somali coast has seen a surge in piracy. Hijackers have carried out hundreds of attacks this year, including one in April involving an American cargo ship that ended with U.S. naval intervention. Somali pirates are currently holding for ransom about a dozen vessels.

In addition to voicing support for the Somali government, officials said Clinton will also take aim at Eritrea, a small Red Sea state that the United States and United Nations accuse of supporting the Islamists with money and weapons. Eritrea denies the charges but questions the legitimacy of Sheik Ahmed's government.

"Somalia is a place where they have been spoilers," Carson said of the Eritrean government. The U.S. and U.N. Security Council have threatened to punish Eritrea.

The U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, Susan Rice, warned last week that Eritrea has only a "small window" of time to change policy or face penalties.

Eritrea's ruler Afewarki: We remain supportive of the Resistance in Somalia in any form , reports Berhane M Tekeste.

In an interview with London's Channel 4 last month posted to the web on Thursday, 30 July 2009, Eritrea ruler, tyrant Isias Afewarki, reiterated that he 'remains supportive of Somali resistance in any form'.

Afewarki made the remark in response to the reporter's question: "The west accuse Eritrea giving weapons and financial support to Al Shabab. Is that true? Following seconds of hesitation, Afewarki replied: "Now look, I wish we had the resource, we had the ability to support Somali resistance in any way. ..as long as this conflict continues, we remain supportive of the resistance in Somalia in any form." There you have it, in your face, ladies and gentlemen of the UN Security Council, US, and African Union. What now?

Eritrean rebels claim successful attack on intelligence center (ST)

Two Eritrean rebel groups said today they hit sharply a government camp of an intelligence unit in southern Eritrea town of Senafe killing 13 military.

The rebel Forces from Red Sea Afar Democratic Organization (RSADO) and Eritrean Salvation Front (RSF), who carried out the attack on July 25, believe that the government agents in this base were responsible for killing and capturing of refugee escapees from the "brutal system".

"Our Afar fighters along with their RSF counterparts on Tuesday at 7 o´clock local time have launched a coordinated and simultaneous commando type operation, in response to ongoing brutal repression and ethnic cleanse against our Afar people and the Eritrean people in general" Yasin Mohammed, RSADO´s communication and information department head told Sudan Tribune on Saturday.

The rebel official said further they captured five government soldiers and brought them back in to Ethiopia. Further, they reiterated their commitment to Geneva Convention on Prisoners of War adding they would hand them over to the UN through the Ethiopian government.

The rebels added they seized 9 Kalashnikov assault rifles, 1 RPG weapon, 1 Heavy Machine Gun, 3 communication phones, and important military documents.

RSADO and DMLEK opposition groups that represent their respective Afar and Kunama Ethnic minorities, have long accused president Isayas Afeworki-led Eritrean government of marginalizing their people and launching an ethnic cleanse against their people in recent years.

The rebel groups have vowed to jointly continue similar and large scale attacks against what they refereed as is "the most repressive regime in the Horn of Africa."

Recently, the Afar movement, RSADO one among a 13 opposition umbrella group (EDA), has intensified military campaigns against Asmara.

The afar rebels have carried out more than five attacks, in the past six months, causing significant blow to the government. Last November they destroyed a military radar system and attacked military camp killing 285 soldiers deep inside Eritrea´s territories.

The Eritrean government is accused of being reason for worst refugee crisis only next to Somalia in just a few years. Afar with 90% illiteracy rate, worst infant mortality and life expectancy in the country, have now produced most refugees to come out of Eritrea, with hundred thousand fleeing death, malnutrition and kidnapping.

Currently, Some 30,000 Eritrean refugees are being sheltered in Ethiopia, others in neighboring countries like Djibouti, Yemen, Sudan and Saudi Arabia.

US on 'intimate' terms with extremists in central Asia – PressTV

A former FBI translator has claimed that the US was on 'intimate' terms with the Taliban and al-Qaeda using the militants to further certain goals in central Asia.

"With those groups, we had operations in Central Asia," said former Turkish language translator Sibel Edmonds on Friday speaking on the radio program, the Mike Malloy Show.

Washington used the gunmen 'as we did during the Afghan and Soviet conflict,' she added referring to the US military support for Afghan fighters against Russia during the 1979-89 Russian invasion.

Luke Ryland, a prolific investigator into the claims, says the tumultuous situation resulting from extremist operations would boost American arms sales in the region while forcing 'oil and gas concessions. '

Edmonds worked for the FBI until 2002 when she was fired on the charge of revealing sensitive information.

The US government has twice barred Edmonds' testimony on some controversial issues.

"These are the confirmed cases," she added stating that her claims were based on 'first-hand' information 'based on what I obtained.'

"There are a lot of things that our government doesn't want us to know."

"It's not very difficult to put two and two together on this," she said.

30 Years After War Ended, Vietnam Needs 300 Years To Heal - Voice of Russia

Vietnam War came to a halt over 30 years ago but the aftermath will tell for another 300 years.

It is necessary to draw up an international programme to assist Vietnam.

And not only Vietnam, for that matter. One should remember that the neighbouring Cambodia and other countries of Indochina are coming up against similar consequences. Another case in point is Yugoslavia, which came under NATO bombing attacks, with unexploded bombs still found there now and then.

The situation is much the same in Iraq. The aftermath of the armed aggressions will keep killing people for a long time still if the international community fails to come to grips with the problem.

Vietnam will need at least 300 years and over 10 billion dollars to clear the whole of its territory of unexploded air bombs, shells and mines that have been there since the war against the United States ended in 1975. This came in a statement by the Deputy Chief of the Vietnam armed forces engineer troops Colonel Fan Duk Tuan.

The Vietnam Was ended 35 years ago. Yet it is still continuing to incur losses. Under a report that Vietnam has prepared together with the US Vietnam Veterans Foundation over 10,000 have died and another 12,000 have been injured in Vietnam in recent years in the post-war years. They have all hit mines that remained in Vietnam following the US aggression. There is no end of this kind of unexploded mines, bombs and shells in the country, says the first deputy Chairman of the Russian-Vietnamese Friendship Society Board Yevgeny Kobelev, who is certainly in the know, since he was in Vietnam during the war years.

"I was in Vietnam as the ITAR-TASS correspondent in the 1964 through 1967, when the US launched its air warfare against North Vietnam, Yevgeny Kobelev says.

"I saw US military aircraft use no end of cluster bombs to carpet-bomb huge areas of North Vietnam. These cluster bombs, just as other types of bombs, would often not go off. They are still lying there, in Vietnam. What´s more, Americans used heaps of ammunition they had had since the end of the Second World War. This is a fact since the Vietnamese found some unexploded bombs, 500-kilo or 1,000-kilo bombs that had been made in 1945. Those bombs, too, would not always blow up on impact. And it is for experts to count just how many such bombs remain scattered over Vietnam today."

Well, experts have counted up the number of such charges, and the figure is staggering. That´s taking account the fact that Vietnamese have been de-mining their country for dozens of years to stop the war, which is long since over, from claiming more human lives. The unexploded bombs also negatively affect the national economy.

According to Fan Duk Tuan, last year alone Vietnam spend almost 70 million dollars on de-mining and making land suitable for civil construction. Access to mineral deposits has been complicated and tourism is hard to develop in the situation that´s taken shape. Yevgeny Kobelev feels that Vietnam needs international assistance, with the United States and its allies in the Vietnam War due to play the main role.

I think a correct and real way to settle the problem, Yevgeny Kobelev says, is to press for the United States and the countries that either supported the US in that war or were immediately involved in fighting should admit their guilt. And it is necessary to draw up an international programme to assist Vietnam.

And not only Vietnam, for that matter. One should remember that the neighbouring Cambodia and other countries of Indochina are coming up against similar consequences. Another case in point is Yugoslavia, which came under NATO bombing attacks, with unexploded bombs still found there now and then. The situation is much the same in Iraq. The aftermath of the armed aggressions will keep killing people for a long time still if the international community fails to come to grips with the problem.

Kenya: Impunity And the Politicisation of Ethnicity - Interview by Firoze Manji

In the wake of a UN report on extrajudicial killings, the prospect of intervention by the International Criminal Court on post-election violence and the formation of a Truth Justice and Reconciliation Commission, Maina Kiai, former chairperson of the Kenya National Commission for Human Rights, speaks to Pambazuka News' Firoze Manji about what the future holds for Kenya. As long as politicians operate under the notion that 'the big man makes the country' rather than institutions, cautions Kiai, it will remain impossible for the country to end impunity without outside assistance.

PAMBAZUKA NEWS: There have been three events related to Kenya which have drawn some public attention. I wonder if you could tell us what you think is the significance of the report by Philip Alston, the United Nations special rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, on extra-judicial killings in Kenya; the submission of the so-called 'envelope' by Kofi Annan, former UN Secretary-General, to the International Criminal Court; and the more recent announcement of the formation of the Truth, Justice and Reconciliation Commission. What has brought all these things about?

MAINA KIAI: I think that the main thing that's brought them about is a systematic and concerted push by Kenyans, especially led by civil society, to end the culture of impunity. The Alston report on extrajudicial executions is something that has been outstanding for really the last fifteen, twenty years in Kenya regarding how the police use force. This was the first international confirmation of what Kenyans know and what Kenyans have been saying for years. So it was important because for a long time the government has been 'pooh-poohing' the reports of national civil society, of national institutions, including the Kenya National Commission on Human Rights, saying that it is not true that there have been such extrajudicial killings. But then when it was vindicated, not only at an international level but also by the UN Special Rapporteur, it confirms to everybody what everybody's been saying. So it puts the government in a spot, in the sense, that not only do Kenyans know that the police have been killing Kenyans extrajudicially without the proper process, but now also the whole world knows that this is a government that simply doesn't care for life. Although the problem isn't new, it's useful that it has come out now and after concerted efforts and a push by Kenyans to have this issue dealt with. The police, even though they are combating crime, whatever they're doing, have to obey the law: There's a process to it and once the police begin breaking the law like any other criminal, then they fall into the same category of ordinary criminals that break the law.

PAMBAZUKA NEWS: While you were chair of the Kenya National Commission for Human Rights, I recall you published a report - just before the 2007 elections - claiming that there had been more than 500 extrajudicial killings by the police. How far do you think that report influenced the UN special rapporteur's decision to carry out an investigation?

MAINA KIAI: I don't know, but I only know that he certainly saw it, and I know that he read it and it was a very concrete report. It was based on facts. We tied - or linked - the dots together, if you wish. There was real evidence about it but, most of all, one of the clear things was the admission on national television, in September, by the then minister of foreign affairs, Raphael Tuju, basically saying that the government has killed off 400 or 500 youth and that nobody's saying anything. So there was an admission from them. It's only that it looked like the admission was done by mistake, or by accident, by the minister for foreign affairs.

But we got it. And so, we had evidence tracing bodies that had been put there.

We had evidence tracing people who came to tell us that they had seen their relatives being abducted and the next time they saw them, they find them dead, and had been put that way by the police. There was a systematic pattern in the manner in which they were being killed and there was a clutch of silence, there was a whole sense of fear. And because the government was using the rationale that they were dealing with crime, with this illegal, militia force called Mungiki, there was a sense, first of all, of fear but there was also a sense amongst Kenyans that, 'Hey! You can do whatever you want to get rid of crime and get rid of these guys.' But there was no way of knowing whether the 500 kids, the 500 young people, were all Mungiki. Nobody knows for a fact. I think that in the investigations that we did, I suspect that easily half of them were simply poor, young Kikuyu who were being extorted. So we were basically saying, 'Well, we are not supporting the Mungiki, we are not saying they are doing the right thing but surely the rule of law must be obeyed and a process to determine whether these guys are Mungiki or not must be fair. But we can't have the police acting as the investigator, as the arrester, as the judge, the jury and the executioner all in one because that, then, is when you have a police state. So these were the arguments we were putting out. And we did send the report to Professor Alston and all the evidence we had. So whether he relied on it, I don't know because he works independently of any institution and he is an independent special rapporteur. But I do know that we had very strong evidence in the report on the extrajudicial executions.

But let me say that this is not a new thing. In the nineties, this was the constant approach of the state. When they found people who they called 'criminals', they executed them. At that time I was working at the Kenya Human Rights Commission, the NGO, and again, we documented case after case after case where the police were just shooting people. The evidence that we were getting, which we could not verify then, was that oftentimes the police were killing criminals, yes, but these were criminals who had links with the police. What they were doing, essentially, was killing the evidence that linked the police as criminals with these guys. So when a criminal became too bigheaded, he wasn't giving the right share or not enough of the share of the loot, they just killed him. So there was a lot of stuff there and it really comes down to what it is: That if a government is going to govern well and run the federal state, it must be able to show the evidence and it must be able to obey the law. Now, my view is, and this is a very unpopular standing in Kenya - because of crime and insecurity people would just like the problem dealt with whatever way you want - but I've always said that if that is the case, then let us simply change the law and make the police the judge, the jury, the executioner and eliminate the entire judiciary, because you don't need it. But nobody's willing to do that. They seem to want to give unilateral, illegal power to the police to acquire and kill people.

PAMBAZUKA NEWS: So, in your view, has the situation worsened in terms of extrajudicial executions since your report in 2007?

MAINA KIAI: No, I don't think that it has actually. I think that the report, because it has raised the alarm, it has actually reduced the killings. I mean, there was, like, a spurt of them in 2007. In 2006 a little bit and then in 2007, they just seemed to rise up. In 2008,a lot of issues then were run on the election, so there are cases where you might argue that there were extrajudicial executions by the police, but there was also a trend going on in Mount Elgon against the Sabaot Land Defence Force. There were cases in Mandera and Eldoret.

So there have been cases where the security faces became a law unto themselves. What we saw, in terms of the Mungiki assault, was that the police then changed tactics. Rather than shoot them, they began to behead them, they began to strangle them, they began to cut them up - so that they began, in a sense, to pick up the same methodologies of Mungiki in order to say that it was Mungiki killing each other. That, again, was revealed and that was also highlighted in the report.

Of course then we got the witness who came out, who was part of the squad, who was a driver in the squad, as a whistleblower who came and said, 'This is what they have been doing.' So it just changed everything in a sense. As you know, in October the witness was killed by the police, and the case has never been solved. But I think the constant revelations help.

This was the same thing that happened, if you remember, in the nineties on torture. You know, there were all the cases of MwaKenya torture in Nyayo House but until the special rapporteur on torture, Sir Nigel Rodley came to Kenya and revealed it did the government actually reduce dramatically the torture it had been doing. So it is one of those strange things where a government elected by the people does not respond to the people themselves but responds to what they call the 'international community'.

PAMBAZUKA NEWS: You've used the term 'impunity'. Has anyone been held to account as a result of the UN special rapporteur's report?

MAINA KIAI: Not yet, but I think this is a process which we are going through in Kenya and there are always attempts to cover up. But what we keep saying is that if nothing happens then the culture of impunity will not only survive, but it will become even more entrenched and these things will keep happening.

Now there was a case, if you remember, of the son of a former MP who was teaching in the UK - he was a law lecturer in the UK. He was shot in a fight in a bar and the policeman who shot him then went to the police station and wrote that he shot somebody who was suspected to be a Mungiki. But for the fact that this was a middle-class Kenyan, but for the fact that his father used to be an MP and has influence, this was exactly the same way that police had been dealing with ordinary, poor Kenyans. But, because he had a profile and his father was somebody important - because he was a PhD from Sheffield University - this became a big case and this policeman has actually been taken to court.

But this is one of the arguments that we kept making and which we should keep making; that in Kenya, if you are poor, if you have no connections, if you have no contacts, then in killing you, well, your life is almost worthless. Anyone can kill you and say you are Mungiki. Anyone can kill you and say you are SLDF (Sabaot Land Defence Force), and that's the end. But if you have a profile, an education, you're the son of somebody important? Then there will be accountability. There is a duality of law that we must stop. The law must be the same for everyone.

PAMBAZUKA NEWS: The press has highlighted another event: The handing in of the so-called envelope by Kofi Anaan, the former UN secretary general, to the International Criminal Court. What is this envelope?

MAINA KIAI: Well, the envelope is a list of names, but it's not just an envelope. There actually are a number of boxes of evidence that accompany the envelope, so what was handed over to the ICC wasn't just an envelope with a list of names but also the boxes with the evidence.

PAMBAZUKA NEWS: A list of names of whom?

MAINA KIAI: They are the names of those who bear the greatest responsibility, as investigated by the Waki Commission.

PAMBAZUKA NEWS: That is to say, those who hold the responsibility...

MAINA KIAI: For the post-election violence? Yes. And the list of names is where there is evidence linking them and that is evidence in the boxes to show the link. Now, of course the ICC could decide that they won't do anything with that list and with that evidence. They will go through the evidence and see if it makes sense or not, but it seems to me, and from what I know that there was some real, good evidence, taken by camera by the Waki Commission and in solid evidence.

Now, of course, it has not been tested in a court of law and, as you know, when you're investigating you don't test everything in a court of law, but that is a process now for the ICC to continue the investigations to see where they go to and eventually come up with - if it will do - a finding that these crimes do fit under the mandate of the ICC and then take action, if Kenya doesn't take action.

PAMBAZUKA NEWS: Many of us were rather surprised, I think, by the Waki Commission report. We are so used to, in Kenya, having whitewashing coming out of commission reports and yet here we have a report, which was quite damning in its content. What was the response of the government and why do you think the Waki Commission was able to be so open in its condemnations?

MAINA KIAI: Well, I think you're right, that it was a surprise because all of us are used to having very bland reports. And if you might remember, the Kriegler Commission report [pdf 798kb] was quite bland, it didn't give anything new to what was already known. And they refused, in fact, to investigate who was responsible for the mess that led to the post-election violence, saying that there was enough mess without adding anything else. And they didn't find it necessary to investigate the mess at the Kenyatta International Conference Centre, at the tally centre (where the final controversial announcement of the 2007 presidential election results was made).

Well, was it a surprise to see the report of the Waki Commission? I think absolutely. It was because of the composition of that commission - it was a very small group, only three people - and they were three good, competent people.

They had an ex-policeman from New Zealand. They had Judge Waki whose integrity is beyond reproach in Kenya. And they had Pascal Kambale from DRC who has been a human rights investigator.

So putting these three people together, mixing up their talent, and then add to that an excellent staff, an excellent secretary to the commission, George Kegoro, who comes from a human rights movement. I think all these things played a tremendous role and because of the kind of people that are there, they opened up themselves to all sorts of interventions from government, from police, from survivors and victims, from the civil society... You know, in a way that was never done before.

I think that what was different was a completely different approach. When you talk to Judge Waki, he says that he believes that there are judges in Kenya who can do similar things. But he says that they should never be left to work by themselves. That is why he proposed in the special tribunal that there be one Kenyan judge, who chairs it, plus two non-Kenyan judges. And he reckons, again, because of the international scrutiny and the international input that is there that the Kenyan judges will then do the right thing; that they have the capacity. It's just that sometimes they get to fear that there is interference by the state. But when there is an international presence, there is a lot less interference than there would otherwise be. Again, our government fears international outcry and they don't like it at all.

But I also think that, perhaps, there was a sense of the moment that Judge Waki in his esteem came to, in that we have never seen such concerted, brutal killings in Kenya in a very long time, in so short a space of time that we had in the post election period. I think there was a sense that history was watching them and that they needed to match the sense of history that was there for them. So, it is a whole combination of things. There was a lot of support, intervention and engagement by the civil society with the Waki Commission - very, very different from the Kriegler Commission, whose approach was very standardised in a normal Kenyan way.

So the approach made a difference, the way they did things made a difference, the people who were there made a difference, the mood of the country made a difference and I think the sense of history made a difference. But will this be sustainable? Will this be a pattern we see? Who knows? I think a lot depends on what actions are, or are not, taken from the Waki report and that will tell us whether we will revert to business as usual or the Waki style and approach is a turn in approach in Kenya's history.

PAMBAZUKA NEWS: Given that we do have judicial competence in Kenya, what is the rationale for the submission of this envelope and evidence to the ICC rather than to a body in Kenya to take this evidence?

MAINA KIAI: It's that there is individual competence and individual capacity but we don't have institutional capacity and institutional competence. That is what we have to distinguish between and that given the way the government has done things and given the fact that even after the election there was no one who believed that the courts would be able to find justice on the elections and the manipulation there. And the fact that historically nobody has confidence in the judiciary.

We know that the police are completely incapable of carrying out proper investigations. This is at an institutional level. Maybe there are one or two, or five or six, policeman who can, but you can rest assured that on issues that have such linkage to people in power, the most competent people will not get a chance, will not be appointed to handle these matters because they are too 'independent'.

So these are things, then, that make it clear that our institutions have really collapsed and that they have collapsed for a number of reasons. One is the way in which institutions are formed, who appoints them, and the methodology of how they operate.

The Prime Minister consistently has been saying, over and over, that we have a colonial police and that it's incapable of protecting Kenyans or of carrying out the investigations. It's something that we all know, that our approach to the police in Kenya is to run away, to fear them rather than to work with them.

When you have a police force like that, which is highly controlled by one person who makes every decision about who to transfer when and where, and when there is a reward system that rewards you if you play their game, then it makes a mess of everything. So the idea of the ICC is really a reflection of the fact that our institutions have collapsed. It's not a reflection on the competence of individuals. We have to find a way to rebuild those institutions. We can only rebuild these institutions by, literally, cracking them open as they exist now and changing the way they are formed.

This has been historical. In the eighties, when Judge Norman Dugdale was the gatekeeper for any matter pertaining to human rights or justice in the courts in Kenya, he never did anything. His job was to make sure that things didn't get addressed. So I'm sure - though I never met him - that he is an intelligent guy, but he decided that he had a role to play in terms of supporting the government. That, again, is one of the things: When people are appointed and have links to those who appointed them, they have debt to them, then it becomes impossible to have institutionally a legitimate organisation that can do the work.

Now, if we are going to do the investigations and prosecutions in Kenya, without doing it internationally, we would have to, first of all, reform these institutions and then do it. This type of reform would take three or four years because there's going to be resistance, because the people who enjoy and benefit from our messed up institutes, as they are, they benefit from it and would like to keep them as they are.

As you can see from proposals for reform presented by the parties, they are basically saying, 'Keep things the same as usual, keep things as they are. Make the presidency all imperial,' says one side, you know? The other side says 'Make the prime minister all imperial.' But nobody is saying, 'We've got to reduce the power in these positions. Move them to the checks and balances and then we, as Kenyans, can have confidence.' We are still operating under the notion, well at least our political parties and our political leadership are, that the big man makes the country; it is not the institutions that make the country. As long as this goes on, it becomes completely impossible for us to ever see the end of impunity through the national domestic systems that exist today.

PAMBAZUKA NEWS: There are many people who feel that the International Criminal Court is in danger of losing its credibility because it has focused primarily on bringing Africans to trial. How far do you think the submission of the envelope to the ICC on the Kenya case is likely to be affected by these perceptions?

MAINA KIAI: I think that you will find that the damage to the leadership of this country and the credibility of the ICC is being done by African leaders who are the ones who want to continue impunity, not for the African people. In the Kenyan case: Poll after poll has been consistent in showing that Kenyans as a people have confidence in and want the ICC to intervene. Now, if you look at four cases before the ICC, three of them have been submitted by the African governments themselves: Uganda, Central African Republic and DR Congo.

They submitted, they referenced, the cases to the ICC themselves. In Sudan, the Darfur, it is the Security Council who referenced the case to the ICC. It is a bit unfortunate for people to then, in fact, say that it's focusing on Africa. We have submitted ourselves to the ICC and at any rate, as well, there is the legitimate argument that because the institutions in Africa are the weakest in the world in terms of justice, it is not surprising that cases from Africa will go to the ICC because we don't have the institutions to domestically deal with these things.

Now, in many parts of the world when there is a crisis like this, one sees domestic remedies being put in place, like Abu Ghraib in Iraq when Americans were torturing Iraqis or in New Guinea, or here in the UK, when a policeman shoots somebody. You see an instant domestic remedy. You see it, definitely, the domestic remedy is instituted and national accountability is counted as wacky.

In Africa we don't have that, so it's not surprising that these things will happen and that Africa will be a focal point. Now remember that it is African governments themselves who have submitted themselves to the ICC. Nobody put a gun to them and said, 'Quiet and sign and ratify.' They did it voluntarily so it is now when they think, 'My goodness, this thing can work,' that the leadership in Africa is saying, 'Hey, we don't want this, it's going too high, it's going to the level of presidents and in Africa the presidents are gods. They rule until they die and at the minute, they don't think they'll die because they're gods. So, when it's coming to the end, they start thinking, 'Hmm, this thing might touch us, though in the beginning we thought this might be useful.' Then they begin retracting, saying, 'Let's move back.'

And so we all, as Africans, have to be very, very careful that we don't fall in the trap where our 'pride' comes before us. This isn't an issue of pride. This is an issue of finding justice for those victims and survivors who have gone through so much pain, who have had relatives killed, who have been raped by troops and raped by people at random who get away with it. This is what is core, we must not lose sight of that. It's not about our pride. It's not about feeling that we are victim because it is our own people who are doing these things to ourselves and we are unable to hold them to account ourselves because we do not have the domestic infrastructure to do so. So, when it comes to that and we submit ourselves to the ICC we should let it go.

Hopefully the lesson that we will be learning is that rather than submit ourselves to the international community we should, like other countries, build domestic structures to deal with these things ourselves in our countries. That is absolutely the sure-fire way but we have got to build them. We have to build them so that if a policeman shoots someone there is immediately, at least an internal investigation within the police or somewhere to ask the question, 'Was that a legitimate shooting or not?'

When there is violence and conflict and something is happening, we should be able to go back and say, 'Let's hold these people accountable for the gang rapes and the mass rapes, the tortures and the killing.' If we do it ourselves then we won't need to go crying and saying that the international community and the ICC is hurting us. This is a challenge to us and we should jump to the challenge. Instead of saying, 'We should get rid of the ICC because it is hurting us,' we should say, 'We should build domestic structures that can end impunity.'

PAMBAZUKA NEWS: All the evidence of the post-election violence indicates that it was state forces that were mostly involved in killings and crimes against humanity. There is a chain of command and that chain of command ends with the president. What would happen then, tomorrow, if the ICC decides, like it has in the Sudan that the current president, Mwai Kibaki, should be brought to trial? What will be the political implications of that?

MAINA KIAI: I think that no president has, in his job description, the killing off of ordinary citizens in society. Accountability should be at any level, at every level: At the bottom those who actually do it and also at the top, those who order it. Kenya's situation is actually very interesting because, in fact, the minister in charge of the police is actually a minister of state in the president's office and so, you're right, the substantive minister for security in Kenya is the president himself. Now, if the evidence leads to the president and it looks like he's going to command responsibility, he was responsible, then let justice take its course.

Part of the problem we have had in Africa is that our presidents have been held to be above the law and the rationale in the sixties during independence was that we needed somebody to hold us together, a unifying force. If you remember, during the eighties and the nineties Moi kept saying that he was that unifying force: His office and himself personally were a unifying factor for Kenya.

Therefore he should be respected and be able to do anything he wanted. But once these leaders break the law, it's out of their jurisdiction. It's out of their mandate. They are now criminals like anybody else and they must be treated as criminals like anybody else. Otherwise Africa will not move forward to where we want to go.

Politically, of course, any head of state is very able to marshal resources and support, to mobilise people; To be able to support them and move against them. We saw that, in Liberia, with Charles Taylor and the special court in Sierra Leone. But, it is incumbent upon us as Kenyans and the international community as well to say, 'If this is where the evidence has gone, let's follow it.'

Having said that, I think the Kenyan case is unique in a number of ways. Yes there was the involvement of the state and you can see it very clearly in parts of the country. But there was also involvement of 'ordinary citizens' in atrocities that, for many of us, seem to fit [the definition of] crimes against humanity. It is incumbent upon the ICC and on the ICC prosecutor that all those responsible for atrocities are held accountable and not just some.

So it is easy to look at in terms of the theatres of conflict we had during the post-election violence where we had killings in Eldoret, Naivasha, Kisumu Nakuru, Mombasa and Nairobi. And then follow that through and see who could have been responsible. If you have the evidence, then charge people. If it means waiting three weeks or one month until you have evidence for all of them so we don't rush the indictment, so there is a joint indictment, all the better for us, politically, in any society.

I think that if I was the prosecutor that's how I would do it. I would say there is clear evidence of crimes against humanity that cut across every side politically so let's get all the evidence that can warrant indictment for all those theatres and then we can move forward. If that happens we will reduce, very much, the potential negative impact that these indictments could have because it's hard then to say, 'Well you're only picking me and not the other side.' Therefore political support is neutralised because everybody can see that every side has been indicted and that every side is being held accountable. If it happens, it will make us move forward way faster than you can believe.

PAMBAZUKA NEWS: One of the promises made by, what some people call, the Government of National Impunity, after the post-election violence was the formation of a Truth and Justice Reconciliation Commission. That had been delayed for some time and then only very recently it was announced that this is to go ahead. What is your view of this?

MAINA KIAI: I think it is a necessary instrument for us to unpackage especially the history of violence, conflict and human rights abuses that have happened in Kenya since 1963. But I think it would have been best when there was a real transition in Kenya in 2003 and 2004. As you note, truth commissions are really transitional justice mechanisms and they are best placed when there is a transition and there is a genuine effort to break with a past and move ahead and that therefore we can then unpackage the history and come up with a narrative that makes sense to all of us and that we can agree upon about what happened, that we can all agree upon, that we can then say this is all about us in that form.

PAMBAZUKA NEWS: One of the striking things about Kenya is that precisely in that period, 2003, 2004, 2005, we saw the formation of consciousness on a national level. People were proud to start calling themselves Kenyans; people were wearing the Kenyan flag, people had badges and hats and caps and t-shirts with the Kenyan flag on it. There was a pride in that. What I find quite striking now is that this has now almost totally disappeared, except amongst a small group of activists. Instead people define themselves by their ethnicity or tribe. How do you account for the politicisation of ethnic identity in Kenya today?

MAINA KIAI: I think it is consistent with how our leadership since, and even before, independence has played the political game: That to maintain power they have to focus exclusively on ethnic identity as the only thing that counts, and therefore you get support and you get blind support to do whatever you want. I think that the shoe fell for the NARC government of 2003 when it, itself, got involved in corruption, and it was found out in grand corruption with the Anglo Leasing case.

When they were then discovered, they thought the best way to marshal support... Remember they had been elected on a zero-tolerance agenda on corruption.

When it was found out that they actually were as involved in grand corruption as Moi had been, they thought the best way to maintain political support was to ethnicise everything. They began ethnicising their political support, work, appointments and other things. As that then happened, it became clear that these guys, because of their declining legitimacy and because they have failed in terms of what they said they would do for their country, they went back, as fast as they could, to the tried and tested methodology of Kenyatta and Moi of using ethnicity.

That has then had an impact on the way we go. So it really is because these are governments that are not interested in the public good, but they want to stay in power and they think then that the best thing - because they have no public interest approach - is then to say that they have ethnic interests.

Some of the words coming out, if you remember, were that they were involved in grand corruption in order to be able to finance the next campaign. That whole sense of elections and staying in power is then seen as: It's good for us, it's important that we people stay in power because that's what's important and then they continue eating and all the things that we want to do. So it's all about corruption, all about eating, all about keeping as much power as you can.

Of course, once you use the approach of ethnicity you certainly get other people angry and everyone's thinking 'maybe the best thing we can do is get into an ethnic cocoons'. Of course, the 90s had a lot of civic awareness and civic education across the country, so people now have a much better understanding of what's right, what's wrong.

The election of 2002 was a turning point in many ways because it made Kenyans feel free; that we could actually remove a person like Moi after all that time. That was an empowering spirit that has continued and a sense that, hey, we don't like it but now we can speak it. There was also a sense in 2003, 2004 of openness and that you could now speak without fear, there was a sense of freedom in terms of freedom of expression and association. That then engendered a sense of resistance. But unfortunately the resistance has followed the pattern that has been set by the politicians which is that of ethnicity. I think that's where the hassle is.

So yes, there are now a small group committed to a national platform and a national agenda. Most people have said that if this is the way to power and the way to eat is through ethnicity then we'll do the same. This is part of a vicious cycle that's ongoing in Kenya that has to be broken at some point. We had a great chance to break it in 2003. I think the Kibaki government lost the plot and lost that chance. In fact, that whole sense of disappointment, the hope that was in Kenya in 2003 was absolutely palpable. We thought, 'We can now do it, we can move forward.' That destruction of hope and the throwing of it into the trash bin may well be one of Kibaki's most significant negative legacies he's going to leave to the country.

PAMBAZUKA NEWS: Do you see ethnicity as being a major factor in the coming years?

MAINA KIAI: I think it will be. I think that we have come to a point where it has become so open and so frequent that it will be. I think that the challenge now is managing and dealing with it so we can come back to at least some ideological or philosophical position that can then create and mobilise people as opposed to ethnic identity being the only thing that we identify with, particularly as far as politics is concerned.

Today ethnic identity has become the only criteria in terms of mobilisation in the political world and campaigning. It's now going to take us a lot longer to move away from that and come towards a political and ideological model for politics.

We have been taken back dramatically and we can't pretend it isn't there because it really is. Even though we want to have national platforms (and they are national issues) to cut across ethnicity.

The poor keep getting poorer, they are the largest group, yet we don't seem to be able to organise people around the concept of getting out of poverty. We don't seem to be able to organise people even in other areas. So it is work that we have to do and the last three or four years have taken us backwards. We have to confront it. Probably the best way to confront it, right now is, within the ethnic groups - to begin a process of challenging the orthodoxy within each ethnic group because what you're now getting to is the sense of a few men who seem to control an entire ethic group and what they say moves the entire ethnic group.

Everyone just follows without thinking. Their personal interests are presented as ethnic interests, as community interests, and people follow. So we've got to break that by challenging internally these ethnic chiefs who, in my opinion, are very close to becoming warlords and once we can do that we'll begin the process of nationally organising again.

PAMBAZUKA NEWS: Are there any parallels with neighbouring Somalia?

MAINA KIAI: Yes, I think there are. Once Siad Barre began topping himself up with his sub clan and then began killing people from other sub clans who were seen as opposition, there was immediately affirmation and the rise of the sub clan as the key identity issue: It doesn't matter about anything else. All of a sudden it was me and my sub clan against you. It doesn't matter that we are both poor. And really our challenge is not the ethnicity of the other but the fact that the leadership that is purporting to be the leadership of the sub clan are all in it for themselves. So there is a lot of work to be done.

I think that that is how civil war begins: When ethnic identity becomes the most important identity and you forget to challenge those so called ethnic leaders and they can get away with anything because we are put in the position of 'if we don't band together they will kill us, if we don't band together we will lose'. So there is a herd mentality but there is also a defensiveness that comes along and that is what we have to crack: That actually, you know what, poor people, be they Kalenjin, Indian, Somali, Kikuyu, have a say. But it's not about these leaders who make it feel that they are killing us because we are Luo, they are not giving us anything because we are Kikuyu, they fear us because Kalenjin, they don't like us because we are Kamba . It's a very easy sentiment to rally around and it's what we have to break. But again, the hassle with it for many of us in Africa is that this was a tried and tested approach of the colonial government that ruled Africa. They quickly divided us into ethnicities and made us hate, fear, be sensitive or suspicious of each other in the divide and rule and for them that was just fine. But now what we have done in our independent government is simply reproduced that approach and perhaps elevated it to a much, much higher level.

So in a sense what we are going through is that we have got a political class in Africa who are essentially as colonial as colonial can be and that's where the problem is.

PAMBAZUKA NEWS: So to conclude, are you optimistic about the coming years in Kenya?

MAINA KIAI: I think the jury is out to be honest. Generally I'm very optimistic about the processes in Africa because when you go around the country and you work with ordinary people and meet them, you do get a sense of hope. But this is the first time, at least in terms of Kenya, that I'm not as hopeful as I once was before, because I'm travelling around a lot, I'm talking to many people, and what I am hearing are things that make me worry for the future.

But there are things that we could be doing. The first of course is the impunity question and dealing with that impunity while the second bit of it is the political class understanding, if they are able to, that the country and the people have really moved on from where they were before. If we continue to trust our leaders without understanding that they keep focusing exclusively on themselves and their own interests, then this will only lead to chaos and conflict. And the third thing is that if civil society can get the space without the fear of execution or arrest, then there is a hope that civil society can get out and begin trying to mobilise people across ethnic lines on the basis of shared interests.

If those things happen then maybe we will survive. But I suspect that if they don't happen, then we will be in a crisis in the next few years. I'm looking at a number of events to see how they're carried the news today in Kenya. There have already begun to be issues around the forthcoming census and concern about how the enumerators are being hired and how corruption is beginning to slip in.

If the census that is coming up in August is badly handled, badly mismanaged, even administratively without being politicised, then that is going to add to the tensions in the country. Then we have the referendum next year on the constitution. Again, if that turns out to be divisive then we are basically saying that we haven't learnt from the past and we are going to be in a crisis.

So the bulk of our challenge really lies with our existing political leaders to understand that they can't manage the situation anymore. They weren't able to manage it in 2007 and as time goes on, that era of managing has now ended.

They want to keep us where we were and to keep doing things as they have been doing. They need to understand that we have changed and they need to change with us. Otherwise they will lead us down the path of chaos and conflict. That's what the challenge is. Will they get an epiphany? I doubt it. But you know what? It is also the work of all of us, wherever we are, whether we are in Oxford or Kenya, to begin to think hard about how we can marshal the forces of reform, change, democracy and social justice together so it can be a force against the existing political class, knowing full well that that class will of course try to disrupt any new third, fourth, fifth force, any new x-factor that tries to change anything will come across a lot of opposition from the existing political class.

And they have the means to attack, through the police and other forces.

So the job ahead is hard and I think we shouldn't be pretending anymore that it will be easy or done overnight. I think it will be a hard job and that there is a lot to be done and I think many people are waiting for somebody to mobilise people around the reform movement, the democracy movement and say, 'Guys let's pull it together, let's work together. Let's get an agenda, we can all work together on.

This isn't about you, it's about the country, it's about the survival of the country at this point.'

Maina Kiai is the former chairperson of the Kenya National Commission for Human Rights.

Firoze Manji is editor in chief of Pambazuka News.

´Uganda came close to war with Sudan´ by Angelo Izama - Kampala

Uganda was warned by its neighbour, the semi-autonomous South Sudan, of grave consequences including war and instability, if it dared arrest indicted Sudanese leader, Omar El Bashir.

Sunday Monitor has learnt from credible sources that a senior member of the Sudan People´s Liberation Army/Movement jetted into Kampala carrying a letter from South Sudan president Salva Kirr Mayardit urgently asking President Yoweri Museveni to diffuse a situation created by Uganda´s position that it could arrest and hand Bashir to the International Criminal Court (ICC) for trial for war crimes and crimes against humanity.

The special envoy was Maj. Gen. Gier Chuang Aluong, the current minister for internal affairs of the Government of South Sudan. He arrived in Uganda on July 14 and had a meeting with President Museveni in the evening of the same day, literally entering State House just as President. Museveni concluded an uncomfortable session with Luis Moreno Ocampo, the chief prosecutor of the ICC.

Sources familiar with Maj. Gen. Aluong´s visit, but who cannot be named because of the sensitivity of the matter, said Mr. Kirr wanted to emphasise to his Ugandan counterpart the danger of even "threatening to arrest" Bashir.

Earlier, Mr Ocampo who made a surprise visit to Uganda expressly to inform the government of its obligations to arrest Bashir if he set foot in the country had held a press conference in Kampala with Minster of State for International Relations Henry Okello Oryem. It was here that the minister said if Bashir, an invitee to the recently concluded Smart Patnership meeting, arrived at Entebbe he would be served with an arrest warrant and taken into custody by the Uganda police.

"Gier said Uganda may turn into Somalia with suicide bombers making security difficult and there was the risk of war if Bashir was facing arrest" said one source with close ties to the South Sudan political establishment.

The choice of envoy itself is telling. Maj. Gen Aluong is a familiar face in Kampala and has close ties with senior members of the National Resistance Movement including former internal affairs minister, Dr Ruhakana Rugunda and Works minister John Nasasira. He was previously minister for communications and helped set up the GoSS mobile phone network, Gemtel with the help of the Uganda government.

A statement from State House did not give any details of Maj. Gen. Aluong´s visit but simply said he and the President discussed bilateral issues. Mr. Oryem and the President´s Principal Press Secretary attended the meeting.

"The issue of President Bashir was not raised in this meeting," Mr Oryem said yesterday adding, however, that Maj. Gen. Aluong had arrived as special envoy and consequently spent some time privately with the President.

The revelations show just how complicated the Ugandan position on Bashir´s arrest warrant is. Uganda would have been the first country which is a signatory to the ICC statute that Bashir would have visited.

"The Sudanese were very mad. They were threatening severe action against Uganda including war," said a Ugandan delegate to the Non-Aligned States meeting which was taking place in the Egyptian resort of Sharm El Sheik at the time.

Foreign Minister Sam Kutesa who represented President Museveni at the meeting was tasked to cool things down with Bashir who was present. Later, Bashir took a phone call from President Museveni in which the latter reportedly apologised.

Uganda and South Sudan have a close relationship having been on the same side of the long war between SPLA and Khartoum. However, today, under the terms of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement, Mr Kirr is also Sudan´s First Vice President.

However the Bashir indictment is also complicated at various levels. Informed sources say President Museveni had been asked by a key European nation to mediate between Bashir and rebels in Darfur whose representatives had already visited Kampala.

Consequently the invitation by Bashir would have been a pro-active attempt by President Museveni to pursue a dialogue had it not been for the intervention of the ICC prosecutor and the controversy his visit generated in the media.

At the same time President Museveni is sensitive to Libyan leader Muammar Gadaffi´s emphatic lobby for Bashir to be protected by African leaders. Col. Gadaffi is chairman of the Afircan Union.

At a broader level, the alliance of Egypt, Sudan and Libya was an issue that Uganda´s Foreign Service has been fretting about for some time.

" Gier said Salva was very concerned and insisted that the matter be resolved quickly" said the source who added that after years of SPLA fighting Khartoum, Mr Kirr who used to be the army´s intelligence chief " knew how dangerous an enemy Khartoum can be".

Note: We do not send pictures with these reports, because of the volume, but picture this emetic scene with your inner eye:

A dying Somali child in the macerated arms of her mother besides their bombed shelter with Islamic graffiti looks at a fat trader, who discusses with a local militia chief and a UN representative at a harbour while USAID provided GM food from subsidised production is off-loaded by WFP into the hands of local "distributors" and dealers - and in the background a western warship and a foreign fishing trawler ply the waters of a once sovereign, prosper and proud nation, which was a role model for honesty and development in the Horn of Africa. (If you feel that this is overdrawn - come with us into Somalia and see the even more cruel reality yourself!)

There is no limit to what a person can do or how far one can go to help - if one doesn't mind who gets the credit !

ECOTERRA Intl. maintains a register for persons missing or abducted in the Somali seas (Foreign seafarers as well as Somalis). Inquiries by family member can be sent by e-mail to office[at]ecoterra-international.org

For families of presently captive seafarers - in order to advise and console their worries - ECOTERRA Intl. can establish contacts with professional seafarers, who had been abducted in Somalia, and their wives as well as of a Captain of a sea-jacked and released ship, who agreed to be addressed "with questions, and we will answer truthfully".

ECOTERRA - ALERTS and pending issues:

PIRATE ATTACK GULF OF ADEN: Advice on Who to Contact and What to Do http://www.noonsite.com/Members/sue/R2008-09-08-2

NATURAL RESOURCES & ARMED FISH POACHERS: Foreign navies entering the 200nm EEZ of Somalia and foreign helicopters and troops must respect the fact that especially all wildlife is protected by Somali national as well as by international laws and that the protection of the marine resources of Somalia from illegally fishing foreign vessels should be an integral part of the anti-piracy operations. Likewise the navies must adhere to international standards and not pollute the coastal waters with oil, ballast water or waste from their own ships but help Somalia to fight against any dumping of any waste (incl. diluted, toxic or nuclear waste). So far and though the AU as well as the UN has called since long on other nations to respect the 200 nm EEZ, only now the two countries (Spain and France) to which the most notorious vessels and fleets are linked have come up with a declaration that they will respect the 200 nm EEZ of Somalia but so far not any of the navies operating in the area pledged to stand against illegal fishing. So far not a single illegal fishing vessel has been detained by the naval forces, though they had been even informed about several actual cases, where an intervention would have been possible. Illegally operating Tuna fishing vessels (many from South Korea, some from Greece and China) carry now armed personnel and force their way into the Somali fishing grounds - uncontrolled or even protected by the naval forces mandated to guard the Somali waters against any criminal activity, which included arms carried by foreign fishing vessels in Somali waters.

LLWs / NLWs: According to recently leaked information the anti-piracy operations in the Gulf of Aden are also used as a cover-up for the live testing of recently developed arsenals of so called non-lethal as well as sub-lethal weapons systems. (Pls request details) Neither the Navies nor the UN has come up with any code of conduct in this respect, while the Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Program (JNLWP) is sponsoring several service-led acquisition programs, including the VLAD, Joint Integration Program, and Improved Flash Bang Grenade. Alredy in use in Somalia are so called Non-lethal optical distractors, which are visible laser devices that have reversible optical effects. These types of non-blinding laser devices use highly directional optical energy. Somalia is also a testing ground for the further developments of the Active Denial System (ADS) Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration (ACTD). If new developments using millimeter wave sources that will help minimize the size, weight, and system cost of an effective Active Denial System which provides "ADS-ACTD-like" repel effects, are used has not yet been revealed. Obviously not only the US is developing and using these kind of weapons as the case of MV MARATHON showed, where a Spanish naval vessel was using optical lasers - the stand-off was then broken by the killing of one of the hostage seafarers. Local observers also claim that HEMI devices, producing Human Electro-Muscular Incapacitation (HEMI) Bioeffects, have been used in the Gulf of Aden against Somalis. Exposure to HEMI devices, which can be understood as a stun-gun shot at an individual over a larger distance, causes muscle contractions that temporarily disable an individual. Research efforts are underway to develop a longer-duration of this effect than is currently available. The live tests are apparently done without that science understands yet the effects of HEMI electrical waveforms on a human body.

ECOTERRA Intl., whose work does focus on nature- and human-rights-protection and - as the last international environmental organization still working in Somalia - had alerted ship-owners since 1992, many of whom were fishing illegally in the 200 nm Exclusive Economic Zone, to stay away from Somali waters. The non-governmental organization had requested the international community many times for help to protect the coastal waters of the war-torn state, but now lawlessness has seriously increased and gone out of hand.

ECOTERRA members with marine and maritime expertise, joined by it's ECOP-marine group, are closely and continuously monitoring and advising on the Somali situation. (for previous information concerning the topics please google keywords ECOTERRA (and) SOMALIA)

The network of the SEAFARERS ASSISTANCE PROGRAMME helped significantly in most sea-jack cases. ECOTERRA Intl. is working in Somalia since 1986 on human-rights and nature protection, while ECOP-marine concentrates on illegal fishing and the protection of the marine ecosystems. Your support counts too.

Please consider to contribute to the work of SAP, ECOP-marine and ECOTERRA Intl. Please donate to the defence fund.

Contact us for details concerning project-sponsorship or donations via e-mail: ecotrust[at]ecoterra.net

Kindly note that all the information above is distributed under and is subject to a license under the Creative Commons Attribution.

To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/uk/

Send your genuine articles or networked information please to: mailhub[at]ecoterra.net

Pls cite ECOTERRA Intl. - www.ecoterra-international.org as source for onward publications, where no other source is quoted.

Press Contacts:

ECOP-marine

East-Africa

254-714-747090

marine[at]ecop.info

www.ecop.info

ECOTERRA Intl.

Nairobi Node

africanode[at]ecoterra.net

254-733-633-733

EA Seafarers Assistance Programme

SAP Media Officers

254-722-613858

254-733-385868

sap[at]ecoterra.net

N.B.: If you are missing certain editions of our updates, this can have two reasons: Either you have not white-listed our sender address office[at}ecoterra-international.org for your inbox and your server provides for censorship (beware of yahoo and barracudacentral as filter) or you do not belong [yet] to our trusted friends and supporters, who receive all updates including those with classified content. Join the network or become a funding supporter to get them all. Look up earlier updates on the internet - e.g. at: http://www.australia.to/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&id=136&Itemid=229

To subscribe to or unsubscribe from this listserve - just send a mail with reference SMCM to office[at]ecoterra-international.org

We welcome the submission of articles for publication through the SMCM.

Note: ECOTERRA is not responsible for the spam that sometimes appears to come from our domains. This is spoofed mail, is part of a systematic, ongoing harassment of independent groups and websites, and is under FBI investigation.

For more information see this article in The Nation or this article in Wired News.

One tree makes approx. 16.67 reams of copy/printing paper or 8,333.3 A4 sheets. Kindly print this email only if strictly necessary.